IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v11y2023i4p803-819id3508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Undergraduate students’ predilection for seating pattern and their engagement in a collaborated blended learning in the science education classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Nja, Cecilia Obi
  • Erim, Costly Manyo
  • Eyo, Eneyo Okon
  • Meremikwu, Anne Ndidi
  • Ekon, Esther Etop

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of undergraduate students’ predilection of seating pattern on their engagement and achievement in a collaborated blended learning in a science education classroom. The sample of this study constituted 120 third year science education students. This research employed a mixed method design by using qualitative and quantitative studies. Two instruments named: Student’s performance and predilection for seating pattern (SPAPFSP) and Students’ class experience with the U-shape seating pattern (SCEUSP), choice of seating pattern and why the choice were used. The Cronbach alpha reliability for the instrument ranged from 0.89 to 0.91. Results of the analysis using a 2 by three analysis of variance indicated that the students in the U-shaped classroom achieved more than those in the row-column arrangement. A paired sample t-test analysis test results reported that students preferred the U-shape seating pattern in their classrooms. The implication of this study is that the seating pattern adopted by a teacher influences the educational outcome of students. It was therefore recommended among others that the U-shape seating arrangement be used in a blended science instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Nja, Cecilia Obi & Erim, Costly Manyo & Eyo, Eneyo Okon & Meremikwu, Anne Ndidi & Ekon, Esther Etop, 2023. "Undergraduate students’ predilection for seating pattern and their engagement in a collaborated blended learning in the science education classroom," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 11(4), pages 803-819.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:803-819:id:3508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3508/7778
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:803-819:id:3508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.