IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v11y2023i3p657-668id3456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence-based inquiry cycle: A model for meeting the council for the accreditation of educator preparation standard 5

Author

Listed:
  • Leah P Peterson

Abstract

This article outlines the need for support and best practices for educator preparation providers (EPPs) to meet the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) standards, specifically, CAEP’s Standard Component 5.1 Quality Assurance System. The purpose of this article was to identify a continuous improvement model that EPPs can be utilized to support quality assurance processes in meeting CAEP Standard Component 5. The article used a secondary analysis methodology to examine past theories, models and research to outline best practices for EPPs. The findings provided a strong case for teacher education programs to utilize an evidence-based inquiry cycle for the foundation of their quality assurance systems and positive change in general. Additionally, best practices were identified to aid in maintaining such a system including support for providers, collaboration with stakeholders, an emphasis on positive culture, and a focus on quality outcomes and data. This article has implications not only for EPPs but for other providers focusing on quality assurance measures that should be supported through inquiry, strong evidence, and continuous improvement efforts. A practical recommendation of this study is that EPPs should use an evidence-based inquiry cycle to assist in developing, implementing, and modifying each provider’s quality assurance system to better serve their candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Leah P Peterson, 2023. "Evidence-based inquiry cycle: A model for meeting the council for the accreditation of educator preparation standard 5," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 11(3), pages 657-668.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:657-668:id:3456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3456/7704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3456/8055
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:657-668:id:3456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.