IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v11y2023i3p602-612id3438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the educational environment of baccalaureate nursing program as perceived by nursing students

Author

Listed:
  • Raghad Hussein Abdelkader
  • Ali Al-Hashmi
  • Aaliyah Momani
  • Salam Bani Hani
  • Mohammed Albashtawy

Abstract

This study aims at assessing the Educational Environment (EE) of the baccalaureate nursing programs as perceived by nursing students in public and private Iraqi Universities. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the level of nursing students' perception of EE in baccalaureate program. The findings show that the general perception for nursing programs was more positive than negative with a total score of (135.42/200), while students’ perception of learning and teaching was very high with a mean score of (M=37+ 6.39); secondly, students’ perception of teachers moving in the right direction showed a mean score (M=28+5.3). The third domain was students’ academic self-perception, wherein students felt more on the positive side with a mean score of (M=20.4+4.52). The fourth domain was students’ perception of the atmosphere, where the students felt that there had a more positive atmosphere, with a mean score of (M=30.8+7.25). The fifth domain was students’ social self-perception, where also students had not too bad scores. The quality of an EE is considered an indicator of the effectiveness of an educational program on students’ learning. A positive perception of nursing students about the educational environment was concluded. This study will develop practical aspects in the nursing work environment and help nurses to be able to challenge work difficulties and refine their psychology.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghad Hussein Abdelkader & Ali Al-Hashmi & Aaliyah Momani & Salam Bani Hani & Mohammed Albashtawy, 2023. "Assessing the educational environment of baccalaureate nursing program as perceived by nursing students," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 11(3), pages 602-612.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:602-612:id:3438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3438/7688
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3438/7982
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:602-612:id:3438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.