IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pjm/journl/vxxiy2016i1p19-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pedagogy For Ethical Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ryan

    (Texas Tech University, USA)

  • Sandra Ryan

    (Texas Tech University, USA)

Abstract

We examine a pedagogy for ethical decision-making that bridges the academic and theoretical with a dynamic and practical approach. We consider how two perspectives of mindfulness contribute to a sustainable practice. First, students explore their inner selves to build and strengthen their self-awareness. Building self-awareness and examining values and beliefs aligns with mindfulness meditation as presented by Lampe and Engleman-Lampe (2012). Second, a cognitive approach is used to examine ethics in depth using theory. This perspective aligns with the construct proposed by Langer and Moldoveanu (2000). We build on these approaches by engaging the individual’s belief and values system with theoretical foundations. We encourage the students to employ academic rigor and self-awareness as a practical approach to business ethics. The method is an ongoing and dynamic process. Sustainability depends on maintaining an informed state through the pursuit of a mindful and vigilant approach to the cognitive and self-awareness perspectives. Classification- JEL:

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ryan & Sandra Ryan, 2016. "A Pedagogy For Ethical Decision Making," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 21(1), pages 25-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:pjm:journl:v:xxi:y:2016:i:1:p:19-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejms.iseg.ulisboa.pt/files/4_EJMS_Vol21_Issue1_2016_a_pedagogy_for_ethical_decision_making_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugh Breakey, 2015. "Positive Duties and Human Rights: Challenges, Opportunities and Conceptual Necessities," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 63(5), pages 1198-1215, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pjm:journl:v:xxi:y:2016:i:1:p:19-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luís Mota de Castro, Tiago Cardão-Pito, Mark Crathorne (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isutlpt.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.