IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v46y2007i3p241-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-reported Symptoms of Reproductive Tract Infections: The Question of Accuracy and Meaning

Author

Listed:
  • Durr-e-Nayab

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.)

Abstract

Verbal surveys are the most common way of gauging any population s health status, but questions remain regarding the accuracy of the responses they elicit. The present paper compares women s self-reports regarding their experiences with reproductive tract infections (RTIs) and the medical diagnosis that they went through to ascertain the presence or otherwise of the infections. Weak concordance was found between women s self-reports and the medical diagnosis, with the former over-representing the presence of infections. Some of the selfreported symptoms were pathogenic in nature, as represented by the true positive reports, but the majority of the self-reports were false positives when compared to medical diagnosis. The conventional health surveys, relying solely on verbal responses, thus, do not essentially represent the actual health situation of a population studied, and any policy intervention formulated exclusively on this information would be flawed. There is a need to understand the non-medical context of illnesses to understand the disease fully.

Suggested Citation

  • Durr-e-Nayab, 2007. "Self-reported Symptoms of Reproductive Tract Infections: The Question of Accuracy and Meaning," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 241-265.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:46:y:2007:i:3:p:241-265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2007/Volume3/241-265.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health; Reproductive Health; Health Surveys Accuracy;

    JEL classification:

    • I00 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General - - - General
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:46:y:2007:i:3:p:241-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Khurram Iqbal). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.