IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rationale of Common Property in the Development Context


  • Soofia Mumtaz

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.)

  • Durr-e-Nayab

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.)


Much of the debate on the modernisation of the common property regimes deals with the problem of the rationality of these regimes. Justification for the policy to be followed in planning change for such arrangements is given according to the divergent view points of development scientists on the subject This paper advocates rethinking of some of the fundamental concepts involved in the examination of the contexts where external intervention is to take place for the purposes of development, if a meaningful inter-disciplinary approach to development is to emerge. It invokes Godelier's treatise on the historic and social logic of real, rather than formal rationality, to highlight the bias inherent within, and limitedness of, the general understanding of the concept of formal rationality, or its focused, rather than holistic treatment in socio-historic terms. The case of the Chaprote forest in the Nagar valley of Northern Pakistan is presented to illustrate the historical and cultural rationality of traditional communal arrangements from the local consumption and conservation points of view, and the functioning of a logic within such arrangements which is relative and specific to the context in question. The variance between the thrust of external intervention, and the local potentials for managing and exploiting local resources is thus emphasised. Some recommendations for developing traditional regimes within the local and larger socio-historical context are made in conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Soofia Mumtaz & Durr-e-Nayab, 1992. "The Rationale of Common Property in the Development Context," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 259-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:31:y:1992:i:3:p:259-285

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Lubna Hasan, 2001. "Analysing Institutional Set-up of Forest Management in Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2001:182, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    2. Hasan, Lubna Hasan, 2001. "Forest Management," MPRA Paper 6457, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Hasan, Lubna, 2002. "Revisiting Commons – Are Common Property Regimes Irrational?," MPRA Paper 8316, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:31:y:1992:i:3:p:259-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Khurram Iqbal). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.