IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v11y2011i1p151-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decisions in Negotiations Using Expert Systems and Mathematical Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Cornelia Muntean

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Ileana Hauer

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Antoaneta Butuza

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The goal of this paper is at the very instant to highlight the role and the importance of mathematical multi-attribute methods, implemented in expert systems, in the preparing of international negotiation processes. We used Exsys Corvid as an expert system generator to implement a prototype of an expert system with three mathematical methods: the method of simple additive weight, the diameter method and the TOPSIS method. The applying of these methods in the exposed case study permitted the preparation and deployment of the negotiation in such a manner that the goals expected by the negotiator should be fulfilled.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornelia Muntean & Ileana Hauer & Antoaneta Butuza, 2011. "Decisions in Negotiations Using Expert Systems and Mathematical Methods," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 151-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:151-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2011/Muntean%20-%20Hauer-Butuza.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business decision making; negotiation preparing process; expert systems; mathematical methods; simple additive weight method; diameter method; TOPSIS method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:151-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.