IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v10y2010i1p37-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Improvement of Processes’ Quality in Organisations Using The Six Sigma Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Mădălina Brutu

    (University of Piteşti, Romania)

Abstract

Six Sigma is a problem-solving methodology. In fact, it’s the most effective problem-solving methodology available for improving business and organizational performance. Bill Smith from Motorola first developed in 1986 the specific elements of Six Sigma. At the beginning, it was a set of practices which have been used in the manufacturing processes in order to eliminate the defects but, as time passed, the concept has been extended so as to be used in other types of businesses, too. The 6th Sigma level corresponds to a 99,9997% performance, respectively 3,4 defects per a million of occasions. A Six Sigma process is a re-designed business process and has three basic elements: Process Improvement; Designing/re-designing the process; The Process Management.

Suggested Citation

  • Mădălina Brutu, 2010. "The Improvement of Processes’ Quality in Organisations Using The Six Sigma Concept," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 37-42.
  • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:37-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2010/20100103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Six Sigma; 3; 4 defects per a million of occasions; DMAIC; DMADV; DPMO;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:10:y:2010:i:1:p:37-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.