IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ieroec/v9y2018i2p261-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor indicators and manufacturing companies ownership patterns in Russia and its regions: results of quantitative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vladislav Spitsin

    (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Russian Federation)

  • Alexander Mikhalchuk

    (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Russian Federation)

  • Irina Pavlova

    (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk State University, Russian Federation)

  • Lubov Spitsina

    (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Russian Federation)

Abstract

Research background: There has been an extensive process of foreign and joint ownership enterprises establishment in the Russian economy since 2006. Domestic manufacturing industry has been experiencing certain pressure on behalf of foreign direct investment bringing new technologies and higher labor requirements. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to investigate differences in employment strategies and labor indicators in the case of enterprises in foreign and joint ownership (FJO) and domestic enterprises in Russian ownership (RO). We analyze the manufacturing industry in Russia and its regions under conditions of stable and crisis periods. Methods: The study enhances the analysis of Rosstat’s statistical data for 2005–2016 and applies ANOVA method to compare the employment results for companies with different ownership patterns. The research is carried out both at the national level of the Russian Federation and at the regional level according to the regions. Findings & Value added: The study identifies significant decline in employment and in-crease in productivity for the period of 2005–2016. In contrast to the crisis of 2008–2009, in 2014–2016 there has been no sharp drop in employment. However, there is a substantial decline in real salaries which is comparable to the crisis of 2008-2009. According to ANOVA, statistically significant differences in labor indicators between FJO and RO companies are manifested. RO companies dominate in employment and payroll funds, while FJO enter-prises have better productivity results with a higher average salary. FJO companies demonstrated faster growth in employment and payroll fund in relatively stable conditions (2012–2013). However, they reacted with a significant reduction in employment for a new crisis (2014–2016), although the creation of new FJO enterprises continued in separate regions of Russia. The results can be used in social policy to regulate the employment and earnings of industrial workers in the current economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladislav Spitsin & Alexander Mikhalchuk & Irina Pavlova & Lubov Spitsina, 2018. "Labor indicators and manufacturing companies ownership patterns in Russia and its regions: results of quantitative analysis," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(2), pages 261-285, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:261-285
    DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/oc.2018.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    foreign direct investments (FDI); manufacturing industry; employment effects; economic productivity; economic crisis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • L62 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Automobiles; Other Transportation Equipment; Related Parts and Equipment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ieroec:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:261-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.