IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pes/ierequ/v13y2018i1p141-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency evaluation of urban transport using the DEA method

Author

Listed:
  • Slawomira Hajduk

    (Bialystok University of Technology, Poland)

Abstract

Research background: An efficient and effectively functioning transport of a city is of great importance both for people who reside within it, as well as companies doing business there. It is an integral part of modern economy and society in the dimension of production and consumption. However, apart from having a positive impact, transport also carries many social costs including congestion, traffic accidents and a negative influence on the natural environment. Consequently, urban transport is an increasingly important area of city management. Purpose of the article: The aim of this study is to assess the technological effectiveness of transport in selected Polish cities. The author created a ranking of cities and identified ways of improve efficiency. Methods: The test procedure used the non-parametric method of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The data for analysis was drawn from the Local Data Bank of the Central Statistical Office defining expenses in the transport section as well as data on the condition and use of transport infrastructure. Calculations were made using Frontier Analyst Application software dedicated to the DEA method. Performance results were determined using the BCC model. The analysis was con-ducted for 18 cities with district status from 150 to 500 thousands inhabitants. Findings & Value added: The main result is the author’s ranking of transport effectiveness in Polish cities. The analysis showed that urban transport is characterized by a rather low technological effectiveness. Full technological efficiency has been shown by five cities: Bialystok, Sosonowiec, Bielsko-Biala, Olsztyn and Rzeszow. An average of the urban transport efficiency reached 51.1%. The lowest effectiveness was only 2.77%. This means that a substantial number of cities do not use optimal inputs. The DEA method enriches the methodology used by scientists to study transport effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Slawomira Hajduk, 2018. "Efficiency evaluation of urban transport using the DEA method," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(1), pages 141-157, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:141-157
    DOI: 10.24136/eq.2018.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24136/eq.2018.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Li & Hongyi Cen & Tai‐Yu Lin & Yi‐Nuo Lin & Yung‐ho Chiu & Su‐wan Wang, 2023. "Assessment of the internet impact on road transportation industry operational efficiency," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 619-640, January.
    2. Skica Tomasz & Leśniowska-Gontarz Małgorzata & Miszczyńska Katarzyna, 2019. "Measuring the Efficiency of Polish Municipalities – Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 54-66, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    efficiency assessment; urban transport; data envelopment analysis; city man-agement;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pes:ierequ:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:141-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam P. Balcerzak (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibgtopl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.