IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v2y2016i1d10.1057_palcomms.2015.50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best for pleasure, not for business: evaluating recreational marine fisheries in West Africa using unconventional sources of data

Author

Listed:
  • Dyhia Belhabib

    (Sea Around Us, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada)

  • Pierre Campredon

    (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Bissau, Guinea Bissau)

  • Najih Lazar

    (USAID/Ghana Sustainable Fisheries Management Project, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, USA)

  • U. Rashid Sumaila

    (Fisheries Economics Research Unit, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada)

  • Braham Cheikh Baye

    (Mauritanian Institute for Oceanographic and Fisheries Research, Nouadhibou, Mauritania)

  • Elimane Abou Kane

    (Mauritanian Institute for Oceanographic and Fisheries Research, Nouadhibou, Mauritania)

  • Daniel Pauly

    (Sea Around Us, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada)

Abstract

West African recreational fisheries, previously overlooked, are often assumed to be insignificant, yet they are increasingly present on social media given anglers’ tendencies to document their experiences. It is important to catch the trend early on as recreational fisheries develop in order to support their sustainable development and to make the most of the alternative economic opportunities that they offer. Here, the recreational fisheries of 11 West African countries are assessed using tourist records from YouTube, blogs and other unconventional records. We introduce the concept of “Recreational-to-Commercial Ratio (RCR)”, that is, the market-equivalent value per tonne of recreational fish injected to the economy, which is similar to “willingness to pay” for fish caught for recreation. Since the recreational fisheries of West African countries gained popularity in the last few years, catches increased and reached a total of 34,000 t annually, none of which was reported in official fisheries statistics. Recreational catches through a total annual revenue of US$152 million had an RCR of approximately 7, which means that developing recreational fisheries would increase the value of fish (whether caught or released) sevenfold. These findings could have major implications for the economy and conservation of fish stocks in West African countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Dyhia Belhabib & Pierre Campredon & Najih Lazar & U. Rashid Sumaila & Braham Cheikh Baye & Elimane Abou Kane & Daniel Pauly, 2016. "Best for pleasure, not for business: evaluating recreational marine fisheries in West Africa using unconventional sources of data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2015.50
    DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2015.50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palcomms.2015.50
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palcomms.2015.50?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward C. Butler & Amber-Robyn Childs & Andrea Saayman & Warren M. Potts, 2020. "Can Fishing Tourism Contribute to Conservation and Sustainability via Ecotourism? A Case Study of the Fishery for Giant African Threadfin Polydactylus quadrifilis on the Kwanza Estuary, Angola," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Nadhéra Babali & Mohamed Kacher & Dyhia Belhabib & Ferial Louanchi & Daniel Pauly, 2018. "Recreational fisheries economics between illusion and reality: The case of Algeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2015.50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.