IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05101-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From reflexive co-production to diffractive co-becoming: insights from new materialism for sustainability sciences

Author

Listed:
  • L. Jamila Haider

    (Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University)

  • Josef “Präa Sepp” Rieser

    (Präau Gut)

Abstract

Sustainability dilemmas such as climate change and biocultural diversity loss have resulted in part from dominant Cartesian and Newtonian modes of thinking, which separate mind and matter, object and subject, social from ecological systems, foregrounding determinacy and linearity. In order to meet widespread calls for transformation away from unsustainability, research processes themselves need to transform to avoid perpetuating the very challenges they are meant to meet. In the Anthropocene era, which acknowledges the effects of human entanglement in Earth systems processes, rigorous sustainability sciences require methodological approaches that enable researchers to understand their own role in change processes. Science and feminist studies, and specifically new materialism, have made interesting propositions for advancements, such as diffractive approaches, that could lend important insights for researchers who are part of transformative change processes. Both sustainability science and new materialism are centrally concerned with making a difference in the world, but thus far, there has been relatively limited exchange between the two fields. The aim of this paper is to show how insights from new materialism can be embodied in the how of sustainability science, to help foster the potentiality for transformative science. The paper is situated amongst current frontiers of sustainability science: a recent turn towards more relational thinking, knowledge co-production and reflexivity, and posits that diffractive approaches could develop these frontiers further, explicitly outlining how to engage in research in which researchers are embedded in the world they seek to understand. Through a personal narrative based on a long-term collaborative ethnography between a researcher and farmer, the paper shows how reflexive stances turn to diffractive processes, and where co-production of knowledge becomes a co-becoming with the world, leading to novel ways of knowing, doing and being. The paper concludes with considerations of a new ethics of entanglement for doing sustainability research.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Jamila Haider & Josef “Präa Sepp” Rieser, 2025. "From reflexive co-production to diffractive co-becoming: insights from new materialism for sustainability sciences," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05101-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05101-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05101-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05101-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viola Hakkarainen & Katri Mäkinen‐Rostedt & Andra Horcea‐Milcu & Dalia D'Amato & Johanna Jämsä & Katriina Soini, 2022. "Transdisciplinary research in natural resources management: Towards an integrative and transformative use of co‐concepts," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 309-325, April.
    2. Guido Caniglia & R. Freeth & C. Luederitz & J. Leventon & S. P. West & B. John & D. Peukert & D. J. Lang & H. Wehrden & B. Martín-López & I. Fazey & F. Russo & T. Wirth & M. Schlüter & C. Vogel, 2023. "Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(5), pages 493-501, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Nast, Carolin & Llopis, Oscar & Yankova, Dima & D'Este, Pablo, 2025. "Sourcing insights elsewhere: The positive influence of academic engagement on scientific impact," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Zhang Yiwen & Shashi Kant & Ilan Vertinsky, 2024. "Enhancing stakeholder engagement in sustainable forest management: A multi‐domain comparative analysis of forest‐related beliefs, values, and behaviors of Canadian Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal groups," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4202-4221, August.
    4. Kui Yi & Jing Zhu & Qingyu Zhang & Fengcai Li & Xi Li, 2023. "Push and pull in the sustainable development of ecological landscape and ecological resources: A dual perceptions of tourists and service staff," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2402-2415, August.
    5. Daria Gritsenko & Jon Aaen & Bent Flyvbjerg, 2024. "Rethinking Digitalization and Climate: Don't Predict, Mitigate," Papers 2407.15016, arXiv.org.
    6. E. Ligtermoet & C. Munera-Roldan & C. Robinson & Z. Sushil & P. Leith, 2025. "Preparing for knowledge co-production: A diagnostic approach to foster reflexivity for interdisciplinary research teams," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Amanda T. Lombard & Jai Clifford-Holmes & Victoria Goodall & Bernadette Snow & Hannah Truter & Patrick Vrancken & Peter J. S. Jones & Kevern Cochrane & Wesley Flannery & Christina Hicks & Lena Gippert, 2023. "Principles for transformative ocean governance," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1587-1599, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05101-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.