IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04919-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing student reading performance through a personalized two-tier problem-based learning approach with generative artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Changqin Huang

    (Zhejiang University
    East China Normal University)

  • Yihua Zhong

    (East China Normal University)

  • Yongzhi Li

    (China National Academy of Educational Sciences)

  • Xizhe Wang

    (Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Zhongmei Han

    (Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Di Zhang

    (Zhejiang Normal University)

  • Ming Liu

    (Southwest University)

Abstract

Reading ability plays a vital role in the academic success of students. Problem-based learning (PBL) helps develop deep engagement with the reading materials and higher-order reading skills. However, conventional PBL (C-PBL) activities ignore differences in students’ cognitive levels and fail to provide timely and targeted feedback and guidance to each student. As a result, many students are unable to actively engage in PBL-based reading activities. To address these problems, this study proposes a personalized two-tier PBL (PT-PBL) approach based on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). It provides a more personalized and refined design for PBL activities to promote personalized reading learning for students. To examine the effectiveness of the proposed approach, 62 college students participated in a quasi-experiment, with the PT-PBL approach in the experimental group and the C-PBL approach in the control group. The results indicate that the PT-PBL approach significantly improves students’ reading performance and motivation. In addition, compared to students with lower engagement, this approach is more effective at improving the reading performance of highly engaged students. Interviews with students showed that those who used the PT-PBL approach focused more on reading tasks and reflected more frequently. The main contribution of this study is proposing a novel PT-PBL approach and providing empirical evidence of its effectiveness, while also creating opportunities for future research to further explore the positive impact of GenAI on reading.

Suggested Citation

  • Changqin Huang & Yihua Zhong & Yongzhi Li & Xizhe Wang & Zhongmei Han & Di Zhang & Ming Liu, 2025. "Enhancing student reading performance through a personalized two-tier problem-based learning approach with generative artificial intelligence," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04919-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04919-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04919-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04919-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Zhao & Andrew Cox & Liang Cai, 2024. "ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Ma, Xiaoyue & Huo, Yudi, 2023. "Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Yunfei & Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Teng, Guangqing & Zhou, Xiaotang, 2024. "Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Zhou, Tao & Zhang, Chunlei, 2024. "Examining generative AI user addiction from a C-A-C perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Kim Shin Young & Sang-Gun Lee & Ga Youn Hong, 2024. "User satisfaction with the service quality of ChatGPT," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 18(3), pages 417-431, December.
    4. Varun Gupta & Hongji Yang, 2024. "Study protocol for factors influencing the adoption of ChatGPT technology by startups: Perceptions and attitudes of entrepreneurs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Rehman, Anis ur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md. Saiful & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Assessing the usage of ChatGPT on life satisfaction among higher education students: The moderating role of subjective health," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Xiaoyue Lin & Tiandong Wang & Fan Sheng, 2025. "Exploring the dual effect of trust in GAI on employees’ exploitative and exploratory innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Ullah, Rafid & Ismail, Hishamuddin Bin & Islam Khan, Mohammad Tariqul & Zeb, Ali, 2024. "Nexus between Chat GPT usage dimensions and investment decisions making in Pakistan: Moderating role of financial literacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Aliyu Alhaji Abubakar, 2025. "Unveiling the cultural tapestry: exploring gender dynamics in embracing digital technology brands among the Y Generation in Saudi Arabia: a social structure theory and luxury value model perspective," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04919-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.