IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01674-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welcome to the fertility clinic of the future! Using speculative design to explore the moral landscape of reproductive technologies

Author

Listed:
  • W. Willems

    (Vrije Universiteit)

  • A. Heltzel

    (Vrije Universiteit)

  • J. Nabuurs

    (Vrije Universiteit)

  • J. Broerse

    (Vrije Universiteit)

  • F. Kupper

    (Vrije Universiteit)

Abstract

The evolving field of reproductive technologies greatly alters our practices of conception and pregnancy. It is thus crucial to develop such innovations in a democratic and sustainable manner through public participation. To date, participation has mostly focused on patients or health professionals deliberating on technological risks, benefits, costs, and healthcare experiences. Thereby, the opportunity is missed to consider broader social and moral implications. Speculative design has been presented as a promising way to open up deliberation on the impacts of new technologies. In this study, speculative design was used to gain insight into citizens’ views and concerns about the social and moral implications of the new reproductive technologies. Six themes of concern were found: the rights of the unborn; access and equality; social implications of individual choices; society as a community; ecology; and the value of wonder. Notably, the latter two issues are not commonly described in the participatory literature on reproductive technologies, indicating that speculative design is suitable for broadening the debate by including issues that have not been addressed yet. Furthermore, the study brought insight into the motivations and complex values that lie behind arguments in which the naturalness of reproductive practices is emphasized. A point of critical reflection is that to broaden the range of reflections probed by speculative design even more, both the designers and the audiences should become more diverse. If this is achieved, it is suggested using speculative design in the context of public deliberation with a more direct influence on innovation trajectories and as a means for the public to become more skilled in critically engaging with imagined futures.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Willems & A. Heltzel & J. Nabuurs & J. Broerse & F. Kupper, 2023. "Welcome to the fertility clinic of the future! Using speculative design to explore the moral landscape of reproductive technologies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01674-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01674-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01674-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01674-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mimi Sheller, 2020. "The reproduction of reproduction: theorizing reproductive (im)mobilities," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 188-195, March.
    2. Cox, Susan M. & Kazubowski-Houston, Magdalena & Nisker, Jeff, 2009. "Genetics on stage: Public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1472-1480, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer L. Lapum & Linda Liu & Kathryn Church & Terrence M. Yau & Perin Ruttonsha & Alison Matthews David & Bruk Retta, 2014. "Arts-Informed Research Dissemination in the Health Sciences," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    2. Nichols, Jennica & Cox, Susan M. & Cook, Christina & Lea, Graham W. & Belliveau, George, 2022. "Research-based Theatre about veterans transitioning home: A mixed-methods evaluation of audience impacts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01674-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.