IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v66y2015i7p1077-1090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of dynamic hazard models and static models for predicting the special treatment of stocks in China with comprehensive variables

Author

Listed:
  • Ligang Zhou

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macau)

Abstract

The stock exchanges in China give a stock special treatment in order to indicate its risk warning if the corresponding listed company cannot meet some requirements on financial performance. To correctly predict the special treatment of stocks is very important for the investors. The performance of the prediction models is mainly affected by the selection of explanatory variables and modelling methods. This paper makes a comparison between the multi-period hazard models and five widely used single-period static models by investigating a comprehensive category of variables including accounting variables, market variables, characteristic variables and macroeconomic variables. The empirical result shows that the performance of the models is sensitive to the choice of explanatory variables but the performance between the multi-period hazard models and the single-period static models has no significant difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligang Zhou, 2015. "A comparison of dynamic hazard models and static models for predicting the special treatment of stocks in China with comprehensive variables," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(7), pages 1077-1090, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:7:p:1077-1090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n7/pdf/jors201471a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n7/full/jors201471a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Umair Bin YOUSAF & Khalil JEBRAN & Man WANG, 2022. "A Comparison of Static, Dynamic and Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Financial Distress of Chinese Firms," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 122-138, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:7:p:1077-1090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.