Why the European Commission Fails to Adhere to the Principles of Good Donorship: The Case of the Governance Incentive Tranche
The European Commission (EC) launched a new aid instrument: the ‘governance incentive tranche’, to incentivise African, Caribbean, Pacific (ACP)-governments to carry out governance reforms. This new initiative fails to incorporate the principles spurred by the aid effectiveness debate, to which the EC has committed itself. This article sets out to understand the gap between discourse and practice and argues that in order to fully grasp the complexity of donor behaviour, domestic issues and political arrangements have to be brought into the analysis. The incentive tranche illustrates how the complexity of the European construction makes the formulation of a coherent policy exceptionally difficult.La Commission Européenne a introduit un nouvel instrument d’aide, ‘la Tranche Incitative pour la bonne Gouvernance’, afin d’inciter les gouvernements des pays in French ACP à mettre en œuvre des réformes de gouvernance. Cette nouvelle initiative n’intègre pas les principes émanant du débat sur l’efficacité de l’aide, principes que la Commission s’est engagée à respecter. Cet article cherche à comprendre ce décalage entre le discours et la pratique et soutient que pour appréhender pleinement la complexité des comportements des pays donateurs, il faut prendre en compte dans l’analyse les questions locales et les accords politiques. La tranche incitative illustre bien à quel point la complexité de la construction Européenne rend difficile l’élaboration d’une politique cohérente.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 23 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ |
|Order Information:|| Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK|
Web: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/pal/subscribe/index.html Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:3:p:409-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniel Foley)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.