IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/buseco/v46y2011i2p88-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Orders of Durable Goods Don't Forecast Shipments

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Bachman

Abstract

Despite current media reporting that assumes new orders for durable goods (NDOG) are an indicator of future economic activity, the new orders series does not improve forecasts of durable goods shipments. This result is true for both aggregate and industry-level measures of new orders, using several econometric techniques. New orders may have been a more useful measure of future shipments in the 1960s than today. This failure may be caused by changes in manufacturing methods. In addition, the structure of the economy may have made new orders less relevant. Also, the new orders series may suffer from measurement problems. Moreover, parameter uncertainty and instability may overwhelm any available information in the new orders series. Analysts should consider reducing the emphasis placed on NDOG as a measure of future economic activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Bachman, 2011. "New Orders of Durable Goods Don't Forecast Shipments," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 88-98, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:46:y:2011:i:2:p:88-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v46/n2/pdf/be20117a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/be/journal/v46/n2/full/be20117a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:buseco:v:46:y:2011:i:2:p:88-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.