IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxiiy2012i1p549-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management Evaluation. Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lup?a-Tãtaru Dana Adriana

    (Transilvania University of Bra?ov, Economic Sciences and Business Administration Faculty)

  • Lup?a-Tãtaru Florin Rãzvan

    (Chamber of Commerce and Industry Bra?ov)

Abstract

The paper aims to present an approach in evaluation of knowledge management processes and systems, based on a case study regarding the development of knowledge management processes and knowledge management system within an IT corporation, which goal is to increase the use of knowledge, considering the context of the knowledge-based economy development. The paper is focused on synthesizing the main aspects of applying a well-known model, McKinsey model, operational made by European Committee for Standardization

Suggested Citation

  • Lup?a-Tãtaru Dana Adriana & Lup?a-Tãtaru Florin Rãzvan, 2013. "Knowledge Management Evaluation. Comparative Study," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 549-552, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xii:y:2012:i:1:p:549-552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/ENG/cuprins%20rezumate/volum2013p1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xii:y:2012:i:1:p:549-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.