IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbrobs/v37y2022i1p39-72..html

Mentoring Migrants for Labor Market Integration: Policy Insights from a Survey of Mentoring Theory and Practice
[A Marginal Cost Analysis of a Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Youth Mentoring Program: New Evidence Using Statistical Analysis]

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Bagnoli
  • Antonio Estache

Abstract

The vast majority of international migrants from developing countries are of working age. And yet, their integration in the formal local labor market of their host countries continues to be a challenge. This paper reviews the scope of mentoring programs as a more systematic policy instrument to facilitate the integration of migrants into the labor market. It synthesizes the multidisciplinary academic research on mentoring. The review highlights the diversity of outcomes indicators and the relevance of context in the choice of mentoring program design. Determinants of success include the personal characteristics of the mentee and of the mentor and the efforts to match them but also the efforts made to account for the human, institutional, financial, and political context in the overall design of programs. Despite the significant progress achieved in understanding the determinants of mentoring effectiveness, the survey shows that there are still many sources of uncertainty on the optimal design of mentoring programs. This justifies a research agenda in a field with growing and significant political and social prominence of direct relevance to both developed and developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Bagnoli & Antonio Estache, 2022. "Mentoring Migrants for Labor Market Integration: Policy Insights from a Survey of Mentoring Theory and Practice [A Marginal Cost Analysis of a Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Youth Mentoring Pr," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 37(1), pages 39-72.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbrobs:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:39-72.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wbro/lkab005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seonho Shin, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of the Matching Grant Program for Refugees: An Observational Study Using Matching, Weighting, and the Mantel-Haenszel Test," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 103-133, March.
    2. Wehrle, Katja & van Dijk, Hans & Szkudlarek, Betina & Newman, Alexander, 2025. "Effective strategies for humanitarian migrants' employment, inclusion and integration – The role of international management," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1).
    3. Claire P. Street & Poh Yen Ng & Haya Al-Dajani, 2022. "Refugee Women Business Mentors: New Evidence for Women’s Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Jie Chen & Wei Wang & Yan Song, 2023. "Economic Potential Gain, Income Uncertainty, and Rural Migrants’ Urban Homeownership: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Chevrier, Sylvie & Goiseau, Elise & Lugosi, Peter & Rase, Jean-François, 2023. "Managing mentoring for the labor market integration of humanitarian migrants," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    6. Shelley Gower & Zakia Jeemi & David Forbes & Paul Kebble & Jaya A. R. Dantas, 2022. "Peer Mentoring Programs for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Refugee and Migrant Women: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbrobs:v:37:y:2022:i:1:p:39-72.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.