IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v40y2026i1p105-124..html

The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times

Author

Listed:
  • Yoonyoung Cho
  • Teresa Molina

Abstract

Using panel data from the Philippines around the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper compares depression rates among beneficiaries of an existing social protection program (a conditional cash transfer program known as the 4Ps) to non-beneficiaries of similar socioeconomic status. Depression rates were low and almost identical for the two groups in late 2019. They increased dramatically for both groups but were significantly lower for 4Ps beneficiaries by July 2020, after the initiation of strict quarantine measures and the distribution of large emergency cash transfers to both groups. The findings suggest that the 4Ps program mattered more for mental health during the crisis, for two possible reasons. First, regular cash support might become more valuable in times of economic hardship and uncertainty. Second, the existing program infrastructure can improve the effectiveness of a government’s crisis response—in this case, by allowing for more timely distribution of emergency cash to those already part of the social protection system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoonyoung Cho & Teresa Molina, 2026. "The Importance of Existing Social Protection Programs for Mental Health in Pandemic Times," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 40(1), pages 105-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:105-124.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhaf003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:40:y:2026:i:1:p:105-124.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.