IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v50y2023i2p206-218..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy-making and evaluation of gender equality programmes: Context, power, and resistance in the transformation process

Author

Listed:
  • Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt
  • Rachel Palmén
  • Susanne Bührer

Abstract

Through exploring the links between policy, evaluation, and gender, using a gender-transformative lens, this article sheds light on policy and evaluation processes of gender equality programmes, such as the political nature of evaluation and power configurations, involving resistance in the change process. Two case studies of gender equality programmes are visited to explore the links between gender policy implementation in specific contexts, and power configurations and resistance as key factors in both implementation and evaluation. We benefitted from the theoretical insights of both the feminist and the theory of change approaches, which helped us to bridge the boundaries between policy, gender scholarship, and evaluation and allowed us to reflect upon systemic factors and underlying mechanisms that are either facilitating or hindering transformation. This article highlights the benefits of applying such an evaluation framework and demonstrates why factoring in power and resistance to evaluations of gender equality programmes is necessary to explain successes or failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt & Rachel Palmén & Susanne Bührer, 2023. "Policy-making and evaluation of gender equality programmes: Context, power, and resistance in the transformation process," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 206-218.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:206-218.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catalina Guerrero-Sanchez & Jordi Bonet-Marti & Barbara Biglia, 2024. "Evaluation of Gender-Related Digital Violence Training in Catalonia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:206-218.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.