IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i6p900-910..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The past futures of techno-scientific promises
[History of the Future: Paradoxes and Challenges]

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre-Benoit Joly
  • Claire Le Renard

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that techno-scientific promises play key roles in the process of emergence of new technologies. The role of promises in the emergence of old technologies when they were young has, however, been overlooked. The main objective of this paper is to fill this gap. We draw on the concept of ‘regime of historicity’, defined as an organizational structure given societies impose on the experience of time and articulate the present, the past, and the future. Using four case studies, we argue that the way techno-scientific promises align with regimes of historicity is crucial. This paper shows that promising in the presentist regime using the modernist frame of innovation (creative destruction) raises many problems Instead, the building of horizons of hope may rest on promises based on processes of collective experimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre-Benoit Joly & Claire Le Renard, 2021. "The past futures of techno-scientific promises [History of the Future: Paradoxes and Challenges]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(6), pages 900-910.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:900-910.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:6:p:900-910.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.