IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v48y2021i2p235-245..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits, Motivations, and Challenges of International Collaborative Research: A Sociology of Science Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Dusdal
  • Justin J W Powell

Abstract

Contemporary science is marked by expanding and diverse forms of teamwork. Collaboration across organizational and cultural boundaries extends the possibilities of discovery. International collaborative research projects often provide findings beyond what one team could achieve alone. Motivated to maintain existing relationships and grow their scientific network, researchers increasingly collaborate, despite often unrecognized or underappreciated costs, since such projects are challenging to manage and carry out. Rarely studied in-depth and longitudinally, the perspectives of scientific team members are crucial to better understand the dynamics of durable collaboration networks. Thus, this retrospective case study of a sociology of science project applies the novel method of autoethnography to examine teamwork benefits, motivations, and challenges. Key challenges found include spatial distance and differences of culture, language, and career stage. This study, spanning North America, Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, focused on collaborators’ characteristics and evolving perceptions of team dynamics over a decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Dusdal & Justin J W Powell, 2021. "Benefits, Motivations, and Challenges of International Collaborative Research: A Sociology of Science Case Study," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 235-245.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:2:p:235-245.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scab010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Igor Linkov & Benjamin Trump & Greg Kiker, 2022. "Diversity and inclusiveness are necessary components of resilient international teams," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Jonathan Adams & Jo Johnson & Jonathan Grant, 2022. "The rise of UK–China research collaboration: Trends, opportunities and challenges [The West Should Start Sending Its Scientists to China]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 132-147.
    4. de Frutos-Belizón, Jesús & García-Carbonell, Natalia & Ruíz-Martínez, Marta & Sánchez-Gardey, Gonzalo, 2023. "Disentangling international research collaboration in the Spanish academic context: Is there a desirable researcher human capital profile?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    5. Tian, Yunpei & Li, Gang & Mao, Jin, 2023. "Predicting the evolution of scientific communities by interpretable machine learning approaches," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    6. Zsolt Kohus & Márton Demeter & Gyula Péter Szigeti & László Kun & Eszter Lukács & Katalin Czakó, 2022. "The Influence of International Collaboration on the Scientific Impact in V4 Countries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:48:y:2021:i:2:p:235-245.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.