IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v46y2019i4p541-551..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents and outcome of entrepreneurial identification: The moderating effect of role orientation

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Zou
  • Yanxia Li
  • Jinyu Guo
  • Feng Guo

Abstract

This article focuses on the entrepreneurial identification (EI), through the perspectives of social identity theory and identity theory. Using an empirical method, we investigate factors that affect the formation of EI. Results show that academic entrepreneurs’ multiple identities (MI) and role conflict (RC) influence such type of formation. Moreover, we use role orientation (RO) as a moderating variable and find that, although RO of academic entrepreneurs can moderate the relationship between RC and EI, the effect of MI on EI cannot be moderated by ROin a significant way. We also discuss and validate the relationship between EI and academic entrepreneurial performance. These findings highlight the importance of certain factors in forming anEI, thus providing theoretical contributions of RO moderation in the relationship between RC and EI, as well as insights into the integration of social identity theory with identity theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Zou & Yanxia Li & Jinyu Guo & Feng Guo, 2019. "Antecedents and outcome of entrepreneurial identification: The moderating effect of role orientation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 541-551.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:4:p:541-551.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scz006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:4:p:541-551.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.