IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v46y2019i2p310-320..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the collaboration networks and productivity of China-born and US-born academic scientists

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Joseph van Holm
  • Yonghong Wu
  • Eric W Welch

Abstract

Chinese scientists constitute the largest group of foreign-born tenure-track faculty in science and engineering (S&E) fields in the USA, and have become a target of recent Chinese government efforts seeking to attract them back to China. This study examines the differences of collaboration networks between Chinese scientists and US-born scientists working in the USA. The findings show significant differences in the size, composition, and role of collaboration networks of Chinese scientists, and how these networks differently impact their productivity. The networks of scientists born in China are smaller, more dispersed, and less communicative. However, despite those networks and less benefit from traditional research resources, Chinese scientists appear to be more productive than their American colleagues are. The study improves understanding of this important group in the USA’s research enterprise and also provides insights for science policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Joseph van Holm & Yonghong Wu & Eric W Welch, 2019. "Comparing the collaboration networks and productivity of China-born and US-born academic scientists," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 310-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:310-320.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scy060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:310-320.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.