IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v44y2017i3p328-340..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Research, Development, and Innovation Policies Cross Borders? The Case of Nordic–Baltic Region

Author

Listed:
  • Piret Tõnurist
  • Rainer Kattel

Abstract

Research, development and innovation (RDI) collaboration across countries has become a widely-discussed topic. At the same time, the RDI policy convergence mechanisms are neither explicitly outlined nor systematically discussed. The article tries to fill the gap by using advances from regional innovation systems literature, economic geography, and policy convergence discussions. Based on the developed analytical framework, current trends in RDI policy making in Europe are discussed and the case of Nordic–Baltic region is highlighted. The empirical analysis of the region is based on the meta-analysis of evaluations of Nordic policy cooperation, data of supra-regional program participation, and seventeen semi-structured interviews with RDI agency executives from the region. The article finds that RDI policies can indeed cross border, but under very specific conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Piret Tõnurist & Rainer Kattel, 2017. "Can Research, Development, and Innovation Policies Cross Borders? The Case of Nordic–Baltic Region," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 328-340.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:328-340.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scw066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuditta Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2014. "Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 358-375, June.
    2. Kadri Ukrainski & Jaan Masso & Hanna Kanep, 2014. "Cooperation patterns in science within Europe: the standpoint of small countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(3), pages 845-863, June.
    3. Alexander Cuntz & Jan Peuckert, 2015. "Openness determinants of national research funding programmes in EU27," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 474-486.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sokolov, Alexander & Shashnov, Sergey & Kotsemir, Maxim & Grebenyuk, Anna, 2019. "Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 221-242.
    2. Francesco Cappellano & Christophe Sohn & Teemu Makkonen & Virpi Kaisto, 2022. "Bringing borders back into cross-border regional innovation systems: Functions and dynamics," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(5), pages 1005-1021, August.
    3. Andrei Coca & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Irina Olimpia Susanu, 2023. "Do Innovation Metrics Reflect Sustainable Policy Making in Europe? A Comparative Study Case on the Carpathian and Alpine Mountain Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liming Zhao & Haihong Zhang & Wenqing Wu, 2019. "Cooperative knowledge creation in an uncertain network environment based on a dynamic knowledge supernetwork," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 657-685, May.
    2. Simen G. Enger & Fulvio Castellacci, 2016. "Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1611-1638, December.
    3. Menger Tu & Sandy Dall'erba & Mingque Ye, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Evolution of the Chinese Artificial Intelligence Innovation Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. De Moortel, Kevin & Crispeels, Thomas, 2018. "International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 145-155.
    5. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta De Prato, 2020. "Technological complexity and economic development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 448-470, May.
    6. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    7. Yun Liu & Zhe Yan & Yijie Cheng & Xuanting Ye, 2018. "Exploring the Technological Collaboration Characteristics of the Global Integrated Circuit Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Wenwen Shen & Yuankun Nie & Chao Long & Zibo Song & Qian Zhang & Decai Tang, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Marina Van Geenhuizen & Pieter Stek, 2015. "Mapping innovation in the global photovoltaic industry: a bibliometric approach to cluster identification and analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa15p697, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Nina Liu & Jiwu Wang & Yan Song, 2019. "Organization Mechanisms and Spatial Characteristics of Urban Collaborative Innovation Networks: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Jiaming Jiang & Rajeev K. Goel & Xingyuan Zhang, 2019. "Knowledge flows from business method software patents: influence of firms’ global social networks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1070-1096, August.
    12. Hugo Horta & Shihui Feng & João M. Santos, 2022. "Homophily in higher education research: a perspective based on co-authorships," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 523-543, January.
    13. Song, Le & Ma, Yinghong, 2022. "Evaluating tacit knowledge diffusion with algebra matrix algorithm based social networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 428(C).
    14. Lisa Craiut & Constantin Bungau & Tudor Bungau & Cristian Grava & Pavel Otrisal & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2022. "Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    15. Giuditta de Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2014. "Mapping the European ICT Poles of Excellence: The Atlas of ICT Acitvity in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC85353, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Wei Yang & Xiang Yu & Ben Zhang & Ziyang Huang, 2021. "Mapping the landscape of international technology diffusion (1994–2017): network analysis of transnational patents," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 138-171, February.
    17. Giuditta De Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2012. "Global R&D network. A network analysis of international R&D centres," JRC Research Reports JRC79478, Joint Research Centre, revised Nov 2012.
    18. Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez & Cassidy R Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière, 2019. "Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Zhigang Hu & Gege Lin & Taian Sun & Xianwen Wang, 2018. "An EU without the UK: mapping the UK’s changing roles in the EU scientific research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1185-1198, June.
    20. Woo Jin Lee & Won Kyung Lee & So Young Sohn, 2016. "Patent Network Analysis and Quadratic Assignment Procedures to Identify the Convergence of Robot Technologies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:328-340.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.