IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v35y2008i9p637-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The entrepreneurial university in China: nonlinear paths

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyan Zhou
  • Xu-Mei Peng

Abstract

Is the entrepreneurial university mode that originally appeared in the US possible in China? Thirty-four universities in the ‘985 Project’ were studied in order to address this question. It is hypothesized that the necessary internal factors for a university to be entrepreneurial are: its research, technology transfer and entrepreneurship capabilities. External factors include: government support through policies and funding, venture capital and collaborations with firms. We concluded that it is possible to achieve an entrepreneurial mode in China, though different from that in the US. As a developing country, China starts from a university-run enterprise model, forming firms within the university. These generally operate in nonhigh-tech mode to gain experience and raise capital, as well as develop research capacity, and then upgrade to a high-tech entrepreneurship mode. A few elite universities will become entrepreneurial universities within 10–20 years. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyan Zhou & Xu-Mei Peng, 2008. "The entrepreneurial university in China: nonlinear paths," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(9), pages 637-646, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:9:p:637-646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/030234208X363187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunjuan Luan & Chunyan Zhou & Aiyun Liu, 2010. "Patent strategy in Chinese universities: a comparative perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(1), pages 53-63, July.
    2. Rippa, Pierluigi & Secundo, Giustina, 2019. "Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 900-911.
    3. Temel, Serdal & Dabić, Marina & Murat Ar, Ilker & Howells, Jeremy & Ali Mert, & Yesilay, Rustem Baris, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between university innovation intermediaries and patenting performance," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Gabriel Brătucu & Radu Constantin Lixăndroiu & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin & Alina Simona Tecău & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Adrian Trifan, 2020. "Entrepreneurial University: Catalyst for Regional Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Ibrahim M. Awad & Meera Kh. Salaimeh, 2023. "Towards an entrepreneurial university model: evidence from the Palestine Polytechnic University," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Aldawod, Alvin, 2022. "A framework for the opportunity recognition process in UK entrepreneurial universities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Mohammad Zarei, 2017. "Entrepreneurial Tournaments: Towards Disclosing the Rivalry Process Among Corporate Entrepreneurs," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 33-57.
    8. Rui Li & Weihua Fang, 2019. "University-industry-government relations of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) universities: The perspective of the mutual information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Desislava Yordanova & José António Filipe, 2019. "Towards Entrepreneurial Universities: Barriers, Facilitators, and Best Practices in Bulgarian and Portuguese Universities," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 213-227.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:35:y:2008:i:9:p:637-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.