IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v9y2000i3p158-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developments of the evaluation system of government-supported research institutes in Korean science and technology

Author

Listed:
  • Chan-Goo Yi
  • Keun-Bok Kang

Abstract

The evaluation system of the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) — a leading Korean research institute, which has been operating its evaluation system since 1993, earlier than 19 other government-supported research institutes — is appraised. Desirable directions for the development of ETRI's evaluation system are suggested. An analytic framework is proposed, comprising evaluation paradigm, basic components of evaluation, supportive components of evaluation and evaluation utilization, and these four main components are subclassified as 14 subcomponents of R&D evaluation. ETRI needs further development in evaluation activities, especially in evaluation purposes and evaluation utilization. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan-Goo Yi & Keun-Bok Kang, 2000. "Developments of the evaluation system of government-supported research institutes in Korean science and technology," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 158-170, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:3:p:158-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154400781777232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dragan Ivanović & Dušan Surla & Miloš Racković, 2011. "A CERIF data model extension for evaluation and quantitative expression of scientific research results," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 155-172, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:3:p:158-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.