IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v8y1999i3p142-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a system of continuous evaluation and monitoring for European co-operation in scientific and technical research (COST)

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Cunningham
  • Maria Nedeva

Abstract

The approach adopted in the design of a system of continuous evaluation and monitoring for COST, the European mechanism for the stimulation of co-operation in scientific and technical research, is described. The emphasis is on the derivation of a framework which asks questions about the information required and how it should be obtained, and which points of the management structure should be responsible for its collection, analysis and subsequent actions. An important aspect is the translation of the informational requirements into a number of key criteria and indicators which may be applied consistently throughout the evaluative process. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Cunningham & Maria Nedeva, 1999. "Towards a system of continuous evaluation and monitoring for European co-operation in scientific and technical research (COST)," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 142-154, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:142-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154499781777487
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:8:y:1999:i:3:p:142-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.