IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v5y1995i1p89-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D evaluation in Portugal

Author

Listed:
  • C Marciano da Silva
  • Luísa Henriques

Abstract

The evolution of evaluation activities in Portugal, and the changes observed in the Portuguese science and technology system are discussed in detail to buildup a reference framework for the analysis of the present situation. It appears that the evaluation path is better characterised by an experimental attitude of constant change with each new programme, rather than a consolidation of practices learned and tested in previous programmes. There seems to be no established evaluation system, and no memory of previous evaluation exercises influencing the design or the outcome of new evaluation activities. It is expected that the pressure of EC structural funds may eventually induce the organisation of the evaluation system in Portugal. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • C Marciano da Silva & Luísa Henriques, 1995. "R&D evaluation in Portugal," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 89-97, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:1:p:89-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/5.1.89
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:1:p:89-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.