IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v35y2026iprvag006..html

Missed marks: understanding the disconnect of research methodology courses in combating predatory publishing

Author

Listed:
  • Vairavan Muthukumar
  • Rajadurai Vijay Solomon

Abstract

Predatory publishing remains a significant challenge in developing countries, including India, despite numerous awareness programs and initiatives aimed at sensitizing faculty to scientific writing, research methodology, and publishing ethics. Although research methodology courses are formally included in academic curricula, the “pay-and-publish” culture persists. To investigate this contradiction, we analyzed the research methodology syllabi of 106 NIRF 2021-ranked colleges using stratified random sampling. Our analysis focused on key publication ethics topics, such as predatory journals, plagiarism, and peer review. The findings indicate a strong emphasis on conducting research but a lack of adequate guidance on publishing in reputable journals. We recommend extending PhD-level coursework on research and publication ethics to postgraduate students and providing comprehensive training for faculty to address predatory practices and educate researchers on avoiding such journals. This knowledge is essential for safeguarding academic integrity and improving publication standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Vairavan Muthukumar & Rajadurai Vijay Solomon, 2026. "Missed marks: understanding the disconnect of research methodology courses in combating predatory publishing," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 35, pages 1-006..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:35:y:2026:i::p:rvag006.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvag006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:35:y:2026:i::p:rvag006.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.