IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025iprvaf054..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Acknowledged organizations in biomedical and life sciences research: a large-scale analysis of classification, citation, and topic evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Xie
  • Tatsawan Timakum
  • Xinyuan Zhang
  • Min Song

Abstract

Funding support plays a vital role in research, particularly in biomedicine. However, the impact of different types of acknowledged organizations on academic recognition and citation influence remains underexplored. Acknowledgements in scholarly articles provide valuable insights into institutional contributions and the collaborative nature of research. This study conducts a quantitative evaluation of acknowledged organizations in biomedical and life sciences research to assess their influence on citation performance. By categorizing acknowledged entities such as universities, enterprises, research institutions, and government agencies, this study examines four key research evaluation questions related to acknowledgement frequency and citation impact. Additionally, co-acknowledgement network analysis is employed to map the distribution of acknowledgements and identify key funding organizations. The study also tracks the evolution of acknowledged research topics over time to assess alignment between funding priorities and scientific trends. Findings reveal that government agencies and universities are the most frequently acknowledged, while industry collaborations exhibit a notable impact on citations. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) emerges as a central node in co-acknowledgement networks, underscoring its key role in biomedical research funding. Moreover, the alignment between funding mandates and research topics highlights the strategic influence of funding agencies in shaping scientific priorities. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of acknowledgements in research evaluation and offer evidence-based guidance for funding agencies, universities, and research policymakers. By clarifying the structure of research support networks, this study enhances our comprehension of the academic community that supports scientific progress and provides a data-driven perspective for evaluating funding effectiveness in biomedical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Xie & Tatsawan Timakum & Xinyuan Zhang & Min Song, 2025. "Acknowledged organizations in biomedical and life sciences research: a large-scale analysis of classification, citation, and topic evolution," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-054..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf054.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf054
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf054.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.