IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025iprvaf051..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do research fellowships impact future earnings? Evidence from the São Paulo Research Foundation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Gama e Colombo
  • Fernanda De Negri

Abstract

Competitive fellowships are widely used for allocating limited public research resources, but their private returns to recipients remain largely unexplored. This paper examines fellowships awarded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil’s largest state-level research funding agency, by estimating their impact on former recipients’ hourly wages across four levels: undergraduate, Master’s, Ph.D. and postdoctoral. The analysis focuses on the intensive margin—individuals employed both before and after the fellowship—and applies a difference-in-differences framework with individual fixed effects. It draws on employment data for approved and rejected applicants, covering up to 3 years before and 10 years after the fellowship period. Results indicate that FAPESP fellowships have a statistically significant positive effect on the future earnings of fellows, averaging 4.5%. The estimated effect persists over time and increases after the initial years, starting at 2.7% in the first year and rising to 4.8% or more in most years from the fifth onward. The positive association appears across all levels, though results are less robust under alternative specifications for undergraduate and Master’s recipients. The impact estimates are larger at the most advanced stages: 7.6% for Ph.D. and 4% for postdoctoral fellowships. These findings underscore the importance of research funding in training highly qualified personnel for both academic and non-academic sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Gama e Colombo & Fernanda De Negri, 2025. "Do research fellowships impact future earnings? Evidence from the São Paulo Research Foundation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-051..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf051.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf051.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.