IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025iprvaf026..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From disruptive to consolidating: the role of declining journal impact factors quartiles in shaping research innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Yingqun Li
  • Ningyuan Song
  • Kejun Chen
  • Ye Chen
  • Lei Pei

Abstract

The Journal Impact Factor is not only one of the most widely accepted metrics for journal evaluation, but also serves as a guiding tool in shaping scientific content. Different direction innovation exhibits significant variations in terms of its conceptual definitions, diffusion processes, and societal impact. Therefore, exploring how JIF shapes the direction of innovation becomes a critical prerequisite for understanding innovation development. The paper focuses on a common negative signal—the declining JIF quartiles—to investigate how that affects the innovation direction of subsequent publications. To address this, the study employs the CD index to quantify journal’s innovation direction and utilizes staggered DID for empirical analysis. The results reveal that journal papers tend to be more conservative when the declining JIF quartiles, with disruptive innovations dropping by 23.81% from a quantitative perspective. Furthermore, this effect intensifies over time and exhibits significant variation across different quartiles. We further explored the potential origins of effect, suggesting that it may stem from the characteristics of disruptive innovations, which are misaligned with the interests inherent in the citation-based evaluation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingqun Li & Ningyuan Song & Kejun Chen & Ye Chen & Lei Pei, 2025. "From disruptive to consolidating: the role of declining journal impact factors quartiles in shaping research innovation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-026..
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf026.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf026.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.