IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v34y2025iprvaf023..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in serving research considering heterogeneity based on DEA: a case study of national science data centers in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxin Gao
  • Qiuhong Zhao
  • Guoliang Yang
  • Xianrui Yu
  • Yanchun Ma

Abstract

Scientific research is increasingly highlighting the significance of scientific data. This trend has led to the emergence of scientific data sharing platforms, which are tasked with managing scientific data and promoting the open sharing of data resources. The objective of this paper is to assess the efficiency of these platforms in supporting research, extending the analytical lens of research evaluation from conventional actor-centric evaluations to a platform-oriented perspective. We construct a two-stage efficiency evaluation model based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method and propose a methodology for mitigating the impact of heterogeneity on evaluation outcomes through adjustment coefficient. A case study of China’s national science data centers is conducted. According to the calculation results and findings of this study, it is recommended that the national science data centers establish a differentiated resource optimization mechanism that prioritizes stage efficiency, which aligns with the institutional demand for a platform-based scientific research paradigm in the digital economy era. The national science data centers should establish subject-differentiated data service strategies. It is suggested to integrate the efficiency results of dynamic evaluation with the experience of benchmarking centers to conduct classification optimization for data centers, addressing technical deficiencies and management bottlenecks.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxin Gao & Qiuhong Zhao & Guoliang Yang & Xianrui Yu & Yanchun Ma, 2025. "Efficiency evaluation of scientific data sharing platforms in serving research considering heterogeneity based on DEA: a case study of national science data centers in China," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-023..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf023.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvaf023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf023.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.