Author
Listed:
- Sepehr Ghazinoory
- Elnaz Mesma Khosroshahi
- Abolghasem Sarabadani
- Mahdi Pakzad
- Mehdi Fatemi
Abstract
With governments adopting austerity policies in budget allocation for research in recent decades, demonstrating the impact of research on society has become a significant challenge for scholars in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS). For this purpose, this article systematically reviews 65 relevant sources to examine the various impacts of HSS on society. According to findings, HSS creates various instrumental (tangible economic benefits) and intrinsic (long-term non-economic benefits) values through its social and political impacts. These contributions help maintain the functions of adaptation, goal attainment, integration, and latency, ensuring the survival of society as a social system. The intrinsic social impact of HSS primarily determines the value frameworks of society and the scope of actors’ activities. While defining, preserving, and revitalizing society’s cultural patterns, these cultural and artistic activities also facilitate the efficient allocation of financial and human resources through income generation and job creation—a socio-instrumental impact that generates tangible economic benefits for society. The political impacts of HSS are more indirect, focusing on generating problem-oriented knowledge to address the challenges governments face in various social, economic, scientific, technological, and environmental fields. With the development of such practical knowledge (Mode 2), HSS research contributes to macro-level goal setting, the legislation and revision of policies, the generation and optimal allocation of financial and human resources, and the reflection of cultural values into policies, ensuring the maintenance of society’s functions of goal attainment, integration, adaptation, and latency.
Suggested Citation
Sepehr Ghazinoory & Elnaz Mesma Khosroshahi & Abolghasem Sarabadani & Mahdi Pakzad & Mehdi Fatemi, 2025.
"How does humanities and social sciences (HSS) research benefit society?,"
Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 34, pages 1-016..
Handle:
RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf016.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:34:y:2025:i::p:rvaf016.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.