IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v21y2012i1p79-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences

Author

Listed:
  • A.J. Nederhof
  • T.N. Van Leeuwen
  • P. Clancy

Abstract

The impact of research in the Space Life and Physical Sciences (SLPS) is compared to that of similar ground-based research over a 20-year period. As SLPS publications are cited initially much lower than similar ones of ground-based research, use of a short-citation window (1--4 years) is detrimental in impact assessment of SLPS in comparison with ground-based research. The citation peak of space research is reached much later than that of ground-based research. During the first 10 years after publication of space research, its field-normalized impact is way behind comparable ground-based research, but it catches up during the next 10 years, although not completely. According to experts, the intermittent character of SLPS research may have contributed to this pattern. Bibliometric indicators should be calibrated to provide optimal monitoring of the citation impact of SLPS research, and of topics that face similar conditions. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • A.J. Nederhof & T.N. Van Leeuwen & P. Clancy, 2012. "Calibration of bibliometric indicators in space exploration research: a comparison of citation impact measurement of the space and ground-based life and physical sciences," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 79-85, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:21:y:2012:i:1:p:79-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvr005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelo Mendoza, 2021. "Differences in Citation Patterns across Areas, Article Types and Age Groups of Researchers," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    3. Wang, Xing & Zhang, Zhihui, 2020. "Improving the reliability of short-term citation impact indicators by taking into account the correlation between short- and long-term citation impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:21:y:2012:i:1:p:79-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.