IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v19y2010i3p161-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bibliometric and historiographic analysis of the work of Tony van Raan: a tribute to a scientometrics pioneer and gatekeeper

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Garfield
  • A I Pudovkin
  • Soren Warner Paris

Abstract

Using the HistCite™ software and downloading searches of the Web of Science database we have created a master collection of 1,518 papers that have cited his work and several subset collections showing his impact in the field of scientometrics and research evaluation. Using the percentile rank indexes of his publications we have demonstrated his high impact in that area and have included a table of 14 of his papers in the 95th percentile of papers published in those respective journals. Using HistCite we also created several additional historiographs of his work, which clearly shows the main papers and books which have influenced his work involving bibliometrics and fractal analysis. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Garfield & A I Pudovkin & Soren Warner Paris, 2010. "A bibliometric and historiographic analysis of the work of Tony van Raan: a tribute to a scientometrics pioneer and gatekeeper," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 161-172, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:161-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820210X503429
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Gao & Yan Chen & Yong Liu & Huai-cheng Guo, 2015. "Scientometric analysis of phosphorus research in eutrophic lakes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 1951-1964, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:161-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.