IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v19y2010i3p158-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthony van Raan and bibliometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Anton J Nederhof
  • Robert J W Tijssen
  • Henk F Moed

Abstract

This issue, inspired by the extensive scientific oeuvre of Anthony van Raan, provides a concise tour de horizon of current research evaluation topics and quantitative studies of science. A historiograph analysis positions key documents, written by Van Raan and other authors, that helped define the present-day field of bibliometrics. A life-cycle output analysis traces phases in the development of CWTS, Anthony's institute at Leiden University. Other contributions in this issue focus on the longterm importance of a paper's references as exemplified by landmark scholarly texts and the phenomenon of ‘Sleeping Beauties’. Several papers focus on how the autonomy of institutes and researchers is related to bibliometric research evaluation. High-quality S&T indicators can act as structuring devises in policy debate and collective learning processes. We also learn about the need for statistical tests to distinguish among researchers with a similar h-index. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton J Nederhof & Robert J W Tijssen & Henk F Moed, 2010. "Anthony van Raan and bibliometrics," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 158-160, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:158-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820210X516560
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:19:y:2010:i:3:p:158-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.