IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v16y2007i1p3-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system

Author

Listed:
  • Katharine Barker

Abstract

The Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) represents one of the most institutionalised forms of research evaluation in the OECD economies. It has become a primary means of concentrating resources for research in a relatively small number of universities. Its main purpose is to inform funding decisions, and the indirect effects come from the public signalling of quality. The RAE seems to have reinforced the traditional ‘high science’ ideals of British universities, encouraging greater coordination of research around traditional disciplinary concerns and inhibiting applied research. Debates among universities and policy-makers have led to a reshaping of the exercise. Its evolution into a highly elaborate procedure combined with its failure as a strategic policy tool to steer university research towards socio-economic impacts have led to its abandonment in its present form. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharine Barker, 2007. "The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 3-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:3-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/095820207X190674
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:16:y:2007:i:1:p:3-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.