IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v14y2005i3p229-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dark side of mobility: negative experiences of doing a postdoc period abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Göran Melin

Abstract

Empirical studies of negative effects or experiences of mobility are rare, if any. To better understand what research mobility is about, both positive and negative effects should be noted. This study attempts to analyse examples of less successful experiences in addition to the range of positive experiences that normally occur as the result of mobility. A sample of Swedish scholars who had earlier been on a postdoc stay abroad have answered a questionnaire that targeted experiences and effects from the postdoc stay. Some 10% to 20% faced negative effects as result of their postdoc stay abroad. Most often, these negative experiences related to the homecoming and the process of transferring their knowledge to the department or the research team upon their return. Routines for incorporating the new knowledge which they bring are sometimes weak, as is the interest from colleagues in what the postdoc scholar has learnt. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Göran Melin, 2005. "The dark side of mobility: negative experiences of doing a postdoc period abroad," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 229-237, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:229-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154405781776102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:3:p:229-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.