IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v14y2005i2p121-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences over a decade: high tech capabilities and competitive performance of 28 nations

Author

Listed:
  • Nils C Newman
  • Alan L Porter
  • J David Roessner
  • Alisa Kongthon
  • Xiao-Yin Jin

Abstract

People often look to technology-based advancement as the key to achieving and maintaining economic competitiveness. This belief often resonates through national policy at the highest levels. Does investing in high technology really provide a competitive advantage? Since 1986, researchers at Georgia Tech's Technology Policy and Assessment Center have been systematically monitoring national high technology-based industrial competitiveness to help address this question. This paper reports on a longitudinal assessment of high technology capability and resulting competitive standing across 28 countries from 1993 through 2003. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils C Newman & Alan L Porter & J David Roessner & Alisa Kongthon & Xiao-Yin Jin, 2005. "Differences over a decade: high tech capabilities and competitive performance of 28 nations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 121-128, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:2:p:121-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154405781776247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reza Bandarian, 2020. "Explaining the competitive advantage in strategic research and technology management for research and technology organisations," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 23-46.
    2. Chan-Yuan Wong & Hon-Ngen Fung, 2017. "Science-technology-industry correlative indicators for policy targeting on emerging technologies: exploring the core competencies and promising industries of aspirant economies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 841-867, May.
    3. Mihai COSTEA & Cristian Valentin HAPENCIUC & Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2016. "Analysis Of Global Competitiveness Pillars’ Influence Upon The Romanian Tourism Industry," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 22(22), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Sancharan Roy, 2011. "Competitiveness in Service Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 51-69, February.
    5. Edward J Malecki, 2007. "Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 638-654, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:14:y:2005:i:2:p:121-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.