IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v13y2004i3p175-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspective factor: a novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality

Author

Listed:
  • Ryosuke L Ohniwa
  • Masatsugu Denawa
  • Mituko Kudo
  • Keiko Nakamura
  • Kunio Takeyasu

Abstract

‘Impact factor (IF)’ has been practically the only indicator to assess journal quality. However, it has various problems associated with citation analysis, such as the effects of ‘different sizes of audience’ and ‘biased citation’. To overcome this, we here propose a new objective index, ‘perspective factor (PF)’, which estimates the journal quality independently of citation analysis. The relationship between IF and PF of life science journals published in 1997, for example, gives a positive correlation when we excluded review journals and extremely high-IF journals, which could not gain comparatively high PF values. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryosuke L Ohniwa & Masatsugu Denawa & Mituko Kudo & Keiko Nakamura & Kunio Takeyasu, 2004. "Perspective factor: a novel indicator for the assessment of journal quality," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 175-180, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:175-180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154404781776374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahed Bigdeli & Morteza Kokabi & Gholam Reza Rajabi & Ali Gazni, 2013. "Patterns of authors’ information scattering: towards a causal explanation of information scattering from a scholarly information-seeking behavior perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(1), pages 103-131, July.
    2. Chien Hsiang Liao, 2011. "How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(3), pages 747-761, March.
    3. Ryosuke L. Ohniwa & Aiko Hibino & Kunio Takeyasu, 2010. "Trends in research foci in life science fields over the last 30 years monitored by emerging topics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 111-127, October.
    4. Didegah, Fereshteh & Thelwall, Mike & Gazni, Ali, 2012. "An international comparison of journal publishing and citing behaviours," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 516-531.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:175-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.