IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v12y2003i3p171-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Projects and publications: interesting patterns in US Environmental Protection Agency research

Author

Listed:
  • Alan L Porter
  • Nils C Newman
  • W Webb Myers
  • David Schoeneck

Abstract

We analyze samples of EPA research projects concerning endocrine disruptors and ecosystem indicators. Prior collaboration among researchers predicts effective teaming well. The projects are quite productive in terms of resulting publications and citations. We assess project-related publication in two ways: in the context of overall publication by the researchers over a decade, and with respect to general activity patterns in these two research domains. Most intriguing is a disparity between research program focus, and the emphases of resulting research publications. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan L Porter & Nils C Newman & W Webb Myers & David Schoeneck, 2003. "Projects and publications: interesting patterns in US Environmental Protection Agency research," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 171-182, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:171-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154403781776609
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:12:y:2003:i:3:p:171-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.