IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v31y2018i12p4863-4883..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long Forward Probabilities, Recovery, and the Term Structure of Bond Risk Premiums

Author

Listed:
  • Likuan Qin
  • Vadim Linetsky
  • Yutian Nie

Abstract

This paper examines the assumption of transition independence of the stochastic discount factor (SDF) in the bond market. This assumption underlies the recovery result of Ross 2015. Following the methodology of Alvarez and Jermann 2005 and Hansen and Scheinkman 2009, we estimate the martingale component in the long-term factorization of the SDF using U.S. Treasury data. The empirically estimated martingale component is highly volatile and produces a downward-sloping term structure of bond Sharpe ratios. In contrast, the transition independence assumption implies a degenerate martingale component and an upward-sloping term structure of bond Sharpe ratios. Thus, transition independence is inconsistent with our empirical results. Received April 17, 2016; editorial decision January 17, 2018 by Editor Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh.

Suggested Citation

  • Likuan Qin & Vadim Linetsky & Yutian Nie, 2018. "Long Forward Probabilities, Recovery, and the Term Structure of Bond Risk Premiums," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(12), pages 4863-4883.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:12:p:4863-4883.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhy042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damir Filipovic & Martin Larsson & Anders B. Trolle, 2018. "On the Relation Between Linearity-Generating Processes and Linear-Rational Models," Papers 1806.03153, arXiv.org.
    2. Jackwerth, Jens Carsten & Menner, Marco, 2020. "Does the Ross recovery theorem work empirically?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(3), pages 723-739.
    3. Likuan Qin & Vadim Linetsky, 2018. "Long-term factorization in Heath–Jarrow–Morton models," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 621-641, July.
    4. Svetlana Boyarchenko & Sergei Levendorskiu{i}, 2019. "Gauge transformations in the dual space, and pricing and estimation in the long run in affine jump-diffusion models," Papers 1912.06948, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:31:y:2018:i:12:p:4863-4883.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.