IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v13y1991i2p259-275..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program Participation and Acreage Response Functions for U.S. Corn: A Regional Econometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Duncan M. Chembezi
  • Abner W. Womack

Abstract

Conventional methods in supply analysis have usually modeled program and non-program acreage response in a single aggregate equation. In the presence of government programs, such an approach is less preferred because it fails to distinguish the factors affecting producers' decisions to participate from the factors affecting their planting decisions. A more effective approach is to estimate producer participation response first and then relate this to program planted acreage. Nonprogram acreage response is estimated separately, and is inversely related to participant response. This article reports empirical estimates from two alternative procedures that directly address this concern. The analysis is based on regional time series data for the Cornbelt and Lake States and the Northern Plains.

Suggested Citation

  • Duncan M. Chembezi & Abner W. Womack, 1991. "Program Participation and Acreage Response Functions for U.S. Corn: A Regional Econometric Analysis," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 259-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:13:y:1991:i:2:p:259-275.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349642
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chembezi, Duncan M. & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Regional Acreage Response For U.S. Corn And Wheat: The Effects Of Government Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:13:y:1991:i:2:p:259-275.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.