IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v93y2026i1p664-696..html

Attention Utility: Evidence from Individual Investors

Author

Listed:
  • Edika Quispe-Torreblanca
  • John Gathergood
  • George Loewenstein
  • Neil Stewart

Abstract

We study attention utility, the hedonic pleasure or pain derived purely from paying attention to information, which differs from the news utility that arises from gaining new information. The main, field, study examines brokerage account login data to show that investors pay disproportionate attention to already-known positive information on their stocks. Through its effect on logins, this selective attention affects their trading activity. Three experimental studies then show that (1) investors are more likely to engage in a paid task that will involve attention to a prior investment if that investment has gained value; (2) paying attention to a winning stock is more motivating than a doubling of monetary incentives; and that (3) attention has value independent of information acquisition.

Suggested Citation

  • Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & John Gathergood & George Loewenstein & Neil Stewart, 2026. "Attention Utility: Evidence from Individual Investors," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 93(1), pages 664-696.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:93:y:2026:i:1:p:664-696.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdaf028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:93:y:2026:i:1:p:664-696.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.