IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v90y2023i6p2703-2762..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lost Capital Asset Pricing Model

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Andrei
  • Julien Cujean
  • Mungo Wilson

Abstract

We provide a novel explanation for the empirical failure of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) despite its widespread practical use. In a rational-expectations economy in which information is dispersed, variation in expected returns over time and across investors creates an informational gap between investors and the empiricist. The CAPM holds for investors, but the securities market line appears flat to the empiricist. Variation in expected returns across investors accounts for the larger part of this distortion, which is empirically substantial; it offers a new interpretation of why “betting against beta” (BAB) works: BAB really bets on true beta. The empiricist retrieves a stronger CAPM on days when public information reduces disagreement among investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Andrei & Julien Cujean & Mungo Wilson, 2023. "The Lost Capital Asset Pricing Model," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 2703-2762.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:90:y:2023:i:6:p:2703-2762.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdad013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:90:y:2023:i:6:p:2703-2762.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.