IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/refreg/v9y2023i2p249-257..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence Authoring Financial Recommendations: Comparative Australian Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Neilson

Abstract

This article explores the use of artificial intelligence software to create financial recommendations. It seeks to define the impacts and outline the benefits of using ChatGPT software in the highly regulated Australian financial sector. ChatGPT was asked to create a financial recommendation, which was evaluated against the relevant regulations and the recommendations of existing professionals and market contributors. The data generated was analysed using Qualtrics analysis techniques. The findings suggest that ChatGPT significantly reduces the time required to carry out creation, input, and editing services for simple financial advice recommendations. However, ChatGPT fails to operate effectively with complex financial advice and requires professional guidance to ensure regulatory adherence. In future, it may be possible to develop ChatGPT as a complementary tool to decrease the time and cost required to create financial recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Neilson, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence Authoring Financial Recommendations: Comparative Australian Evidence," Journal of Financial Regulation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 249-257.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:249-257.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jfr/fjad004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:refreg:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:249-257.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jfr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.