IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v140y2025i2p1471-1524..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Putting Quantitative Models to the Test: An Application to the U.S.-China Trade War

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Adão
  • Arnaud Costinot
  • Dave Donaldson

Abstract

The primary motivation behind quantitative work in international trade and many other fields is to shed light on the economic consequences of policy changes and other shocks. To help assess and potentially strengthen the credibility of such quantitative predictions, we introduce an IV-based goodness-of-fit measure that provides the basis for testing causal predictions in arbitrary general equilibrium environments as well as for estimating the average misspecification in these predictions. As an illustration of how to use the measure in practice, we revisit the welfare consequences of the U.S.-China trade war predicted by Fajgelbaum et al. (2020).

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Adão & Arnaud Costinot & Dave Donaldson, 2025. "Putting Quantitative Models to the Test: An Application to the U.S.-China Trade War," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 1471-1524.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:2:p:1471-1524.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/qje/qjae041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:140:y:2025:i:2:p:1471-1524.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.